.png){kind=icon}
返回
Social Science Sequestered
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.3389/fclim.2020.00002.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Greenhouse gas removal (GGR) raises many cultural, ethical, legal, social, and political issues, yet in the growing area of GGR research, humanities and social sciences (HASS) research is often marginalized, constrained and depoliticised. This global dynamic is illustrated by an analysis of the UK GGR research programme. This dynamic matters for the knowledge produced and for its users. Without HASS contributions, too narrow a range of perspectives, futures and issues will be considered, undermining or overpromising the prospects for the responsible development of GGR (and threatening worse side-effects), and limiting our understanding of why and how policy demands GGR solutions in the first place. In response, we present policy principles for bringing HASS fully into GGR research, organized around three themes: (1) HASS-led GGR research, (2) Opening up GGR futures, and (3) The politics of GGR futures.
Keyword:
humanities and social sciences
GGR research
marginalized
constrained
depoliticised
UK GGR programme
research policy principles
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
F
IF:
4.1
论文数:
1.2K
被引数:
2.9K
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Salinity Effects on the Abundance of Boeckella Poopoensis (copepoda, Calanoida) in Saline Ponds in the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile.png)
Crustaceana
CrustaceanaIF0
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏The crossover from classical to quantum regime in the problem of the decay of the metastable state
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容