.png){kind=icon}
返回
Spontaneous causal inferences
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00016-1.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Three studies examine the hypothesis that people spontaneously (i.e., unintentionally and without awareness of doing so) infer causes (the Spontaneous Causal Inference, or SCI, hypothesis). Using a cued-recall paradigm, Study 1 examines whether SCIs occur and Study 2 allows for a comparison between implicitly inferred and explicitly mentioned causes. Study 3 examines whether SCIs can be fully explained in terms of spreading activation to general, abstract schemes. It is suggested that STIs (e.g., Winter & Uleman, 1984), and spontaneous predicting inferences (e.g., McKoon & Ratclif, 1986a,1986b), may be better understood in their relation to SCIs. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
Keyword:
COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING
ATTRIBUTION
COMPREHENSION
EXPECTANCY
JUDGMENTS
VALENCE
PEOPLE
MEMORY
TEXT
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.1
论文数:
3.8K
被引数:
1.5W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
查看更多内容