.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
This editorial provides an overview of the editorial process at one peer-reviewed publication. The editorial starts by explaining the role of the players (the editors, the review team, the area editor). The editorial then covers each step in the review process, from how reviewers are selected to how authors should respond to different outcomes. The editorial ends by discussing citation metrics, appointments to the editorial board and copyrights. This article argues that (1) requesting more reviews yields a faster, more informative review process; (2) publishing more articles can raise citations per article; (3) for many submissions, some reviewers should evaluate procedures, whereas others should evaluate contribution; (4) reviewers should not micromanage revisions; (5) editors must, unfortunately, write overly cautious decision letters; and (6) it is important to reward reviewers with board appointments and published acknowledgments. Journals must be author-friendly to survive.
Keyword:
marketing science
electronic journals
print journals
citations
peer review
referees
research streams
the review process
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
10.1
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
2.2W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Non-linear Physiology and Gene Expression Responses of Harmful Alga Heterosigma akashiwo to Rising CO2.png)
Protist.png)
ProtistIF0
PREAI
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏Effect of Ammonia Addition on the Growth of an AlO(OH) Film during Steam Coating ProcessCoatings
OAAI
CoatingsIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions电影行业: 实践中的关键问题，当前研究和新的研究方向
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容