返回
摘要
En 中文
This research documents aperfection premiumin evaluative judgments wherein individuals disproportionately reward perfection on an attribute compared to near-perfect values on the same attribute. For example, individuals consider a student who earns a perfect score of 36 on the American College Test to be more intelligent than a student who earns a near-perfect 35, and this difference in perceived intelligence is significantly greater than the difference between students whose scores are 35 versus 34. The authors also show that the perfection premium occurs because people spontaneously place perfect items into a separate mental category than other items. As a result of this categorization process, the perceived evaluative distance between perfect and near-perfect items is exaggerated. Four experiments provide evidence in favor of the perfection premium and support for the proposed underlying mechanism in both social cognition and decision-making contexts.
Keyword:
perfection
categorization
numerical cognition
social cognition
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.3
论文数:
1.7K
被引数:
7.3K
机构
引用论文
Single-Paper Meta-Analysis: Benefits for Study Summary, Theory Testing, and Replicability单篇论文荟萃分析: 研究总结、理论测试和可复制性的好处

