.png){kind=icon}
返回
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1177/0146167204271418.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The Implicit Association Test (IAT) assesses relative strengths of four associations involving two pairs of contrasted concepts (e.g., male female and family-career). In four studies, analyses of data from 11 Web IATs, averaging 12, 000 respondents per data set, Supported the following conclusions: (a) Sorting IAT trials into subsets does not yield conceptually distinct measures; (b) valid IAT measures can be produced using as few as two items to represent each concept; (c) there are conditions for which the administration order of IAT and self-report measures does not alter psychometric properties of either measure; and (d) a known extraneous effect of IAT task block order was sharply reduced by using extra practice trials. Together, these analyses provide additional construct validation for the IAT and suggest practical guidelines to users of the IAT.
Keyword:
implicit social cognition
Implicit Association Test
attitudes
Internet
methodology
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.9
论文数:
5.0K
被引数:
2.0W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
分享收藏Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice内隐和外显的民族中心主义: 重新审视偏见的意识形态
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation来自临床笔记的数据: 关于结构和柔性文档之间张力的观点
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容