arrow
返回

Useful effect size interpretations for single case research

delete2007-03-01
delete197
PRE
AI
R
Richard Parker *
S
Shanna Hagan–Burke
DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2006.05.002delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
An obstacle to broader acceptability of effect sizes in single case research is their lack of intuitive and useful interpretations. Interpreting Cohen's d as standard deviation units difference and R-2 as percent of variance accounted for do not resound with most visual analysts. In fact, the only comparative analysis widely supported in single case research (SCR) is percent of nonoverlapping data. This article explores five alternative interpretations of Cohen's d and R2 effect sizes that may be more acceptable to the SCR field. They are: (a) Cohen's (Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum) Percent of Nonoverlapping Data (CPND), (b) Parker et al.'s (Parker, R.I., Cryer, J., Byrns, G., 2006. Controlling trend in single case research. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 418-440, Parker, R.I., Hagan-Burke, S., Vannest, K., in press. Percent of all non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND. journal of Special Education) Percent of All Nonoverlapping Data (PAND), (c) Rosenthal et al. (Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R., & Rubin, D. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) Binomial Effect Size Display (BESD), (d) Percentile Rank in Control Group (PR), and (e) McGraw and Wong's (McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1992). A common language effect-size statistic. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 361-365) Common Language Effect Size (CLES). Each of the five interpretation schemes are applied to a published data set and are evaluated according to (a) intuitive appeal, (b) relevance to visual analysis, (c) case of calculation, and (d) technical adequacy. Three of the five appear to be improvements over prevailing practice.
Keyword:
EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS
VISUAL INSPECTION
SCHOOL-PSYCHOLOGY
STATISTICS
BEHAVIOR
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Behavior Therapy 封面图
Behavior Therapy
IF:
3.8
论文数:
2.4K
被引数:
7.4K

机构

T
Texas A&M University System
学者数:
4.4W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 4.0K
引用论文

引用论文

A COMMON LANGUAGE EFFECT SIZE STATISTIC
err1992-03-01
err680
PREAI
errMCGRAW, KO; WONG, SP
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容