.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Vaccination decisions and policies present tensions between individual rights and the moral duty to contribute to harm prevention. This article focuses on ethical issues around vaccination behaviour and policies. It will not cover ethical issues around vaccination research. Sources of data: Literature on ethics of vaccination decisions and policies. Areas of agreement: Individuals have a moral responsibility to vaccinate, at least against certain infectious diseases in certain circumstances. Areas of controversy: Some argue that non-coercive measures are ethically preferable unless there are situations of emergency. Others hold that coercive measures are ethically justified even in absence of emergencies. Growing points: Conscientious objection to vaccination is becoming a major area of discussion. Areas timely for developing research: The relationship between individual, collective and institutional responsibilities to contribute to the public good of herd immunity will be a major point of discussion, particularly with regard to the COVID-19 vaccine.
Keyword:
vaccination ethics
public health ethics
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.2
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
5.6K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏分享收藏Parental Financial Incentives for Increasing Preschool Vaccination Uptake: Systematic Review.png)
PEDIATRICS.png)
OAAI
PEDIATRICSIF6.4
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容