.png){kind=icon}
返回
Validity and validation in archetype analysis: practical assessment framework and guidelines
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1088/1748-9326/ac4f12.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Archetype analysis is a promising approach in sustainability science to identify patterns and explain mechanisms shaping the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Although considerable efforts have been devoted to developing quality standards and methodological advances for archetype analysis, archetype validation remains a major challenge. Drawing on the insights from two international workshops on archetype analysis and on broader literature on validity, we propose a framework that identifies and describes six dimensions of validity: conceptual; construct; internal; external; empirical; and application validity. We first discuss the six dimensions in relation to different methodological approaches and purposes of archetype analysis. We then present an operational use of the framework for researchers to assess the validity of archetype analysis and to support sound archetype identification and policy-relevant applications. Finally, we apply our assessment to 18 published archetype analyses, which we use to describe the challenges and insights in validating the different dimensions and suggest ways to holistically improve the validity of identified archetypes. With this, we contribute to more rigorous archetype analyses, helping to develop the potential of the approach for guiding sustainability solutions.
Keyword:
archetype analysis
validation
validity
sustainability science
social-ecological systems
期刊
IF:
5.6
论文数:
9.5K
被引数:
5.0W
机构
查看更多机构
引用论文
Archetype analysis in sustainability research: methodological portfolio and analytical frontiers.png)
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
OAAI
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETYIF3.2
OAAI分享收藏Barriers to scaling sustainable land and water management in Uganda: a cross-scale archetype approachECOLOGY AND SOCIETYOAAI
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETYIF3.2
OAAI分享收藏Archetypes of common village pasture problems in the South Caucasus: insights from comparative case studies in Georgia and AzerbaijanECOLOGY AND SOCIETYOAAI
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETYIF3.2
OAAI分享收藏Investigating potential transferability of place-based research in land system science土地系统科学中基于地方的研究的潜在可转移性研究OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏 查看更多内容