arrow
返回

Validity in quantitative content analysis

delete2004-03-01
delete340
delete
OA
AI
L
Liam Rourke
T
Terry Anderson
DOI:10.1007/BF02504769delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Over the past 15 years, educational technologists have been dabbling with a research technique known as quantitative content analysis QCA). Although it is characterized as a systematic and objective procedure for describing communication, readers find insufficient evidence of either quality in published reports. In this paper, it is argued that QCA should be conceived c as a form of testing and measurement. If this argument is successful, it becomes possible to frame many of the problems associated with QCA studies under the well-articulated rubric of test validity. Two sets of procedures for developing the validity of a QCA coding protocol are provided, (a) one for developing a protocol that is theoretically valid and (b) one for establishing its validity empirically. The paper is concerned specifically with the use of QCA to study educational applications of computer-mediated communication.
Keyword:
ONLINE
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

E
ETR&D-EducATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
IF:
4.2
论文数:
2.2K
被引数:
7.0K

机构

暂无机构信息