返回
WHAT PASSES AS A RIGOROUS CASE STUDY?
DOI:10.1002/smj.722.png)
摘要
En 中文
This article investigates the methodological sophistication of case studies as a tool for generating and testing theory analyzing case studies-published during the period 1995-2000 in 10 influential management journals. We find that case studies emphasized external validity at the expense of the two more fundamental quality measures, internal and construct validity. Comparing case studies published in the three highest-ranking journals with the other seven, we reveal strategies that may be useful for authors wishing to conduct methodologically rigorous case study research. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
case studies
case study research
validity
reliability
期刊
IF:
7.2
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
4.6W
机构
引用论文
A DUAL METHODOLOGY FOR CASE STUDIES: SYNERGISTIC USE OF A LONGITUDINAL SINGLE SITE WITH REPLICATED MULTIPLE SITES
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
IF5.4
Exploring the Interplay of Food Security, Safety, and Psychological Wellness in the COVID-19 Era: Managing Strategies for Resilience and Adaptation
Foods
IF0

