.png){kind=icon}
返回
Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1177/0162243915574602.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This article takes stock of recent efforts to implement controversy analysis as a digital method in the study of science, technology, and society (STS) and beyond and outlines a distinctive approach to address the problem of digital bias. Digital media technologies exert significant influence on the enactment of controversy in online settings, and this risks undermining the substantive focus of controversy analysis conducted by digital means. To address this problem, I propose a shift in thematic focus from controversy analysis to issue mapping. The article begins by distinguishing between three broad frameworks that currently guide the development of controversy analysis as a digital method, namely, demarcationist, discursive, and empiricist. Each has been adopted in STS, but only the last one offers a digital move beyond impartiality. I demonstrate this approach by analyzing issues of Internet governance with the aid of the social media platform Twitter.
Keyword:
controversy analysis
media technologies
digital methods
methodology
media bias
politics of knowledge
politics of technology
Twitter
Internet governance
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
S
IF:
3.3
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
3.9K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
分享收藏Application of yinhuo decoction in coping with side effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy of malignant tumor应用银花解毒汤应对恶性肿瘤放化疗副作用.png)
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容