arrow
Return

A Machine Learning Framework for Assessing Experts' Decision Quality

delete2024-10-15
delete0
PRE
AI
W
Wanxue Dong *
M
Maytal Saar‐Tsechansky
T
Tomer Geva
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2021.03357delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Expert workers make non-trivial decisions with significant implications. Experts' decision accuracy is, thus, a fundamental aspect of their judgment quality, key to both management and consumers of experts' services. Yet, in many important settings, transparency in experts' decision quality is rarely possible because ground truth data for evaluating the experts' decisions is costly and available only for a limited set of decisions. Furthermore, different experts typically handle exclusive sets of decisions, and thus, prior solutions that rely on the aggregation of multiple experts' decisions for the same instance are inapplicable. We first formulate the problem of estimating experts' decision accuracy in this setting and then develop a machine-learning-based framework to address it. Our method effectively leverages both abundant historical data on workers' past decisions and scarce decision instances with ground truth labels. Using both semi-synthetic data based on publicly available data sets and purposefully compiled data sets on real workers' decisions, we conduct extensive empirical evaluations of our method's performance relative to alternatives. The results show that our approach is superior to existing alternatives across diverse settings, including settings that involve different data domains, experts' qualities, and amounts of ground truth data. To our knowledge, this paper is the first to posit and address the problem of estimating experts' decision accuracies from historical data with scarce ground truth, and it is the first to offer comprehensive results for this problem setting, establishing the performances that can be achieved across settings as well as the stateof-the-art performance on which future work can build.
Keywords:
machine learning
worker evaluation
decision accuracy
information systems

Journal

Management Science cover
Management Science
IF:
4.9
Papers:
794
Citations:
5.0W

Organization

C
Chinese Univ Hong Kong
Scholars:
2.6K
Papers: 1.6K
Citations: 662
U
Univ Texas Austin
Scholars:
2.0K
Papers: 1.2K
Citations: 477
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

More for less: adaptive labeling payments in online labor markets
err2019-06-13
err0
errOAAI
errTomer Geva; Maytal Saar-Tsechansky; Harel Lustiger
errShare
errSave
Learning from multiple annotators: Distinguishing good from random labelers
err2013-09-01
err86
errOAAI
errRodrigues, Filipe; Pereira, Francisco; Ribeiro, Bernardete
errShare
errSave
The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients
err1991-02-07
err0
errOAAI
errLucian L. Leape; Troyen A. Brennan; Nan Laird; Ann G. Lawthers; A. Russell Localio; Benjamin A. Barnes; Liesi Hebert; Joseph P. Newhouse; Paul C. Weiler; Howard Hiatt
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Expert Political Judgment
err
IF0
err2017-08-07
err0
PREAI
errPhilip E. Tetlock
errShare
errSave
The performance evaluation context: Social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship components
err2008-09-01
err152
PREAI
errFerris, Gerald R.; Munyon, Timothy P.; Basik, Kevin; Buckley, M. Ronald
errShare
errSave
researcher View more