.png){kind=icon}
Return
Achieving knowledge interoperability: An XML/XSLT approach
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.eswa.2005.04.024.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Development of an intelligent system requires not only profound understanding of the problem under study, but also employment of different knowledge representation techniques and tools often based on a variety of paradigms and technological platforms. In this context automation of knowledge sharing between different systems becomes increasingly important. One solution might be to extend a knowledge modeling tool by implementing a set of new classes or functions for importing other knowledge formats (using, e.g. Java, C+ +, etc.). But, this can be a rather difficult and time consuming task. Since XML is now widely accepted as knowledge representation syntax, we believe that a more suitable solution would be to use eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformation (XSLT) a WK standard for transforming XML documents. A special advantage of this approach is that even though an XSLT is written independently of any programming language, it can be executed by a program written in almost any up-to-date programming language. We experiment on an XSLT-based infrastructure for sharing knowledge between three knowledge modeling and acquisition tools that use different conceptual models for knowledge representation in order to evaluate cons and pros of the proposed XSLT approach. Two of these tools, JessGUI and JavaDON are ongoing efforts of the GOOD OLD AI research group to develop interoperable development tools for building intelligent systems, while the third one is Protege-2000, a broadly accepted ontology development tool. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
interoperability
knowledge sharing
XML
XSLT
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
7.5
Papers:
3.0W
Citations:
10.2W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
No cited papers available