.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Alternative pathways to high-performance workplaces
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1080/09585190500220176.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
In this paper we outline four high workplace performance models, two of which have high-road or enabling characteristics. These are the strategic human resource management and organizational trust models, respectively. The second two models - the tabour process and numerical flexibility models - motivate workers to raise productivity through the use of the stick (coercion) rather than the carrot. Based on a representative survey of Australian workers, we compare these models in terms of their capacity to explain relative workplace productivity. We find that all four models have some explanatory power. However, contrary to expectations, the low-road numerical flexibility model provides the best fit with the data. We interpret this finding by reference to recent evidence of workforce trends indicating the attraction and ability of employers to pursue this pathway toward higher productivity. We conclude with some suggestions for future research that would assist in developing this line of enquiry.
Keywords:
high-performance work practices
productivity
human resource management
flexibility
workplace relations
Australia
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
6.2
Papers:
4.1K
Citations:
4.4K
Organization
No organization information available