arrow
Return

Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research?

delete2024-08-26
delete2
delete
OA
AI
P
Patricia O’Sullivan *
A
Ayelet Kuper
J
Jennifer Cleland
DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10362-ydelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This column is intended to address the kinds of knotty problems and dilemmas with which many scholars grapple in studying health professions education. In this article, the authors focus on how to help mentees take an analytic approach to improve their mixed methods work. Mixed methods research has increased in popularity and with that comes both strengths and weaknesses in these studies. We suggest key elements to look for when reading a mixed methods research paper. We also provide guidance around weaknesses we have noticed in reporting.

Journal

Advances in Health Sciences Education cover
Advances in Health Sciences Education
IF:
3.3
Papers:
1.8K
Citations:
4.4K

Organization

U
university of california san francisco
Scholars:
5.3W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 67
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.5W
Papers: 33.7W
Citations: 6.6K
U
university of toronto
Scholars:
14.7W
Papers: 12.0W
Citations: 165
researcher View more organizations