arrow
Return

Benchmarking algorithms for single-cell multi-omics prediction and integration

delete2024-09-25
delete0
PRE
AI
Y
Yinlei Hu
S
Siyuan Wan
Y
Yuanhanyu Luo
Y
Yuanzhe Li
T
Tong Wu
W
Wentao Deng
C
Chen Jiang
S
Shan Jiang
Y
Yueping Zhang
N
Nianping Liu
杨宗澄 (Zongcheng Yang)
陈发来 (Falai Chen) *
B
Bin Li *
瞿昆 (Kun Qu) *
DOI:10.1038/s41592-024-02429-wdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The development of single-cell multi-omics technology has greatly enhanced our understanding of biology, and in parallel, numerous algorithms have been proposed to predict the protein abundance and/or chromatin accessibility of cells from single-cell transcriptomic information and to integrate various types of single-cell multi-omics data. However, few studies have systematically compared and evaluated the performance of these algorithms. Here, we present a benchmark study of 14 protein abundance/chromatin accessibility prediction algorithms and 18 single-cell multi-omics integration algorithms using 47 single-cell multi-omics datasets. Our benchmark study showed overall totalVI and scArches outperformed the other algorithms for predicting protein abundance, and LS_Lab was the top-performing algorithm for the prediction of chromatin accessibility in most cases. Seurat, MOJITOO and scAI emerge as leading algorithms for vertical integration, whereas totalVI and UINMF excel beyond their counterparts in both horizontal and mosaic integration scenarios. Additionally, we provide a pipeline to assist researchers in selecting the optimal multi-omics prediction and integration algorithm. This Analysis study compares computational methods for single-cell multi-omics prediction and integration, generating useful insights for method users and developers working with different analysis purposes and biological problems.
Keywords:
RNA
CHROMATIN
PROTEINS
BINDING

Journal

Nature Methods cover
Nature Methods
IF:
32.1
Papers:
7.2K
Citations:
12.7W

Organization

U
university of science & technology of china, cas
Scholars:
3.2W
Papers: 2.7W
Citations: 74
C
chinese academy of sciences
Scholars:
56.5W
Papers: 44.9W
Citations: 704