arrow
Return

Benchmarking spatial and single-cell transcriptomics integration methods for transcript distribution prediction and cell type deconvolution

delete2022-05-16
delete355
PRE
AI
B
Bin Li
张文 cover
张文 (Wen Zhang)
C
Chuang Guo
H
Hao Xu
L
Longfei Li
M
Minghao Fang
Y
Yinlei Hu
X
Xinye Zhang
X
Xinfeng Yao
M
Meifang Tang
K
Ke Liu
X
Xuetong Zhao
J
Jun Lin
L
Linzhao Cheng
陈发来 (Falai Chen)
田雪 cover
田雪 (Tian Xue)
瞿昆 (Kun Qu) *
DOI:10.1038/s41592-022-01480-9delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Spatial transcriptomics approaches have substantially advanced our capacity to detect the spatial distribution of RNA transcripts in tissues, yet it remains challenging to characterize whole-transcriptome-level data for single cells in space. Addressing this need, researchers have developed integration methods to combine spatial transcriptomic data with single-cell RNA-seq data to predict the spatial distribution of undetected transcripts and/or perform cell type deconvolution of spots in histological sections. However, to date, no independent studies have comparatively analyzed these integration methods to benchmark their performance. Here we present benchmarking of 16 integration methods using 45 paired datasets (comprising both spatial transcriptomics and scRNA-seq data) and 32 simulated datasets. We found that Tangram, gimVI, and SpaGE outperformed other integration methods for predicting the spatial distribution of RNA transcripts, whereas Cell2location, SpatialDWLS, and RCTD are the top-performing methods for the cell type deconvolution of spots. We provide a benchmark pipeline to help researchers select optimal integration methods to process their datasets. This work presents a comprehensive benchmarking analysis of computational methods that integrates spatial and single-cell transcriptomics data for transcript distribution prediction and cell type deconvolution.
Keywords:
GENOME-WIDE EXPRESSION
RNA-SEQ
GENE-EXPRESSION
ATLAS
VISUALIZATION

Journal

Nature Methods cover
Nature Methods
IF:
32.1
Papers:
7.2K
Citations:
12.7W

Organization

U
university of science & technology of china, cas
Scholars:
3.2W
Papers: 2.7W
Citations: 74
C
chinese academy of sciences
Scholars:
56.1W
Papers: 44.8W
Citations: 704