arrow
Return

Changes in estimands and prevalence of discrepancies in conclusions under the two-trial paradigm: a systematic review

delete2026-05-22
delete0
delete
OA
AI
A
Alex Hlavaty
C
Clément Jambon-Barbara
M
Marc Manceau
S
Selin Keklik
J
Jean‐Christophe Lega
M
Michel Cucherat
C
Charles Khouri
M
Matthieu Roustit *
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112341delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Key Findings • Duplicated trials only represent about 5% of phase 3 trials between 2010 and 2024. • Substantial outcome modifications that may seriously compromise the robustness of the results were observed in less than 5% of situations.
Keywords:
estimands
phase 3 trials
outcome modifications
duplicated trials
two-trial paradigm
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology cover
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
IF:
5.2
Papers:
8.4K
Citations:
4.3W

Organization

H
hospices civils de lyon
Scholars:
778
Papers: 320
Citations: 1
C
cic 1406
Scholars:
5
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
U
Universite de Lyon
Scholars:
8
Papers: 9
Citations: 1
H
hp2
Scholars:
9
Papers: 4
Citations: 0
researcher View more organizations