Defining and Operationalizing Appropriation for Science Learning

doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.928215

Defining and Operationalizing Appropriation for Science Learning

2014-12-09

41

PRE

AI

DOI：10.1080/10508406.2014.928215

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

The goal of this article is to contribute to understanding the interplay between students' disciplinary engagement and their identity construction. The term appropriation, borrowed from scholars in linguistics and education, was chosen to capture this broader sense of productive learning that sits at the nexus of disciplinary engagement and identity. Appropriation implies deep conceptual understanding, but it also involves a reflexive process of transforming scientific discourse in a way that is authentic and personal. The core aim of this article is to turn the term appropriation into a theoretical construct by means of an analytic process of defining, operationalizing, and testing the definition against student interview and classroom data. Five discourse markers for operationalizing appropriation were discovered through this process. Appropriation, in our study, implies students' discourse is (A) an expression of a personal signature idea, (B) grounded in the discipline, (C) thick, in that it involves a metacognitive and epistemological dimension, (D) non-incidental, in the sense of being consistently used throughout classroom activities, and (E) a carrier of social relationships, in that it positions the student within classroom. The study is grounded in an extended intervention on thermodynamics in an Italian secondary school class (grade 12).

Keywords:

IDENTITY

ENGAGEMENT

COMPLEXITY

DESIGN

FORMS

WORK

Defining and Operationalizing Appropriation for Science Learning

Abstract

AI Summary

Journal

Organization