arrow
Return

DOES EXPERIENCE IMPLY LEARNING?

delete2015-07-16
delete73
PRE
AI
J
Jaideep Anand
L
Louis Mulotte *
C
Charlotte Ren
DOI:10.1002/smj.2401delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Research summary: Research traditionally uses experiential learning arguments to explain the existence of a positive relationship between repetition of an activity and performance. We propose an additional interpretation of this relationship in the context of discrete corporate development activities. We argue that firms choose to repeat successful activities, thereby accumulating high experience with them. Data on 437 aircraft projects introduced through three governance modes show that the positive performance effect of the firm's experience with the focal mode becomes insignificant after accounting for experience endogeneity. We suggest that in a general case, experience with corporate development activities may be tinged with both learning and selection effects. Therefore, omitting to account for experience endogeneity may lead to incorrect conclusions from an empirically observed positive experience-performance relationship. Managerial summary: This paper emphasizes that firms generally choose to undertake the corporate development activities (new product introductions, diversification moves, international expansions, alliances, acquisitions, etc.) with which they have been the most successful in the past and that they expect to be the most successful in the future. Hence, if a firm possesses certain capabilities, it will repeatedly engage in certain activities corresponding to those capabilities, thereby simultaneously achieving high levels of activity experience as well as superior activity performance. This view suggests that an empirically observed positive experience-performance relationship may not be due solely to learning-based enhanced capabilities but may also be driven by astute self-selection. Overall, we provide a new interpretation of the relationship between experience and performance in the context of infrequent, heterogeneous, and causally-ambiguous corporate development activities. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords:
corporate development activities
experience
learning
endogeneity
make-ally-buy choices
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Strategic Management Journal cover
Strategic Management Journal
IF:
7.2
Papers:
3.4K
Citations:
4.6W

Organization

U
University System of Ohio
Scholars:
15.5W
Papers: 13.0W
Citations: 200
T
tilburg university
Scholars:
4.8K
Papers: 5.7K
Citations: 4
O
Ohio State University
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 80
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Antiviral treatment of argentine hemorrhagic fever
err1994-01-01
err0
PREAI
errDelia A. Enria; Julio I. Maiztegui
errShare
errSave
Manipulation of the black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens; Diptera: Stratiomyidae) fatty acid profile through the substrate
err2022-08-15
err0
PREAI
errS.A. Siddiqui; E.R. Snoeck; A. Tello; M.C. Alles; I. Fernando; Y.R. Saraswati; T. Rahayu; R. Grover; M.I. Ullah; B. Ristow; A.A. Nagdalian
errShare
errSave
Echographic measurement of skin thickness in adults by high frequency ultrasound to assess the appropriate microneedle length for intradermal delivery of vaccines
err2007-08-01
err0
PREAI
errAurélie Laurent; Frédéric Mistretta; David Bottigioli; Karima Dahel; Catherine Goujon; Jean François Nicolas; Anca Hennino; Philippe E. Laurent
errShare
errSave
researcher View more