.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Extended Polysaccharide Analysis within the Liposomal Encapsulation of Polysaccharides System
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.3390/ma13153320.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The Liposomal Encapsulation of Polysaccharides (LEPS) dual antigen vaccine carrier system was assessed across two distinct polysaccharides for encapsulation efficiency, subsequent liposomal surface adornment with protein, adjuvant addition, and size and charge metrics. The polysaccharides derive from two different serotypes ofStreptococcus pneumoniaeand have traditionally served as the active ingredients of vaccines against pneumococcal disease. The LEPS system was designed to mimic glycoconjugate vaccines that covalently couple polysaccharides to protein carriers; however, the LEPS system uses a noncovalent co-localization mechanism through protein liposomal surface attachment. In an effort to more thoroughly characterize the LEPS system across individual vaccine components and thus support broader future utility, polysaccharides fromS. pneumoniaeserotypes 3 and 4 were systematically compared within the LEPS framework both pre- and post-surface protein attachment. For both polysaccharides, >= 85% encapsulation efficiency was achieved prior to protein surface attachment. Upon protein attachment with either a model protein (GFP) or a pneumococcal disease antigen (PncO), polysaccharide encapsulation was maintained at >= 61% encapsulation efficiency. Final LEPS carriers were also evaluated with and without alum as an included adjuvant, with encapsulation efficiency maintained at >= 30%, while protein surface attachment efficiency was maintained at >=similar to 50%. Finally, similar trends and distributions were observed across the different polysaccharides when assessed for liposomal zeta potential and size.
Keywords:
liposome
serotype
polysaccharide
Streptococcus pneumoniae
vaccine
pneumococcal disease
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.2
Papers:
5.6W
Citations:
15.1W