arrow
Return

Individual Differences in Second Language Sentence Processing

delete2012-08-16
delete45
delete
OA
AI
L
Leah Roberts *
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00711.xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
As is the case in traditional second language (L2) acquisition research, a major question in the field of L2 real-time sentence processing is the extent to which L2 learners process the input like native speakers. Where differences are observed, the underlying causes could be the influence of the learner's first language and/or differences (fundamental or not) in the use of processing strategies between learners and native speakers. Another factor that may account for L1L2 differences, perhaps in combination with others, is individual variability in general levels of proficiency or in learners general cognitive capacities, such as working memory and processing speed. However, systematic research into the effects of such individual differences on L2 real-time sentence processing has yet to be done because researchers in the main attempt to control for individual differences in general cognitive capacities rather than to investigate them in their own right: nevertheless, a review of the current work on L2 sentence and discourse processing raises some interesting findings. An overview of this research is presented in this paper, highlighting what appear to be the circumstances under which individual differences in factors such as working memory capacity and proficiency do or do not affect L2 sentence processing. Taken together, the data suggest that it is only under certain experimental circumstancesspecifically, when participants are asked to perform a metalinguistic task directing their attention to the manipulation at the same time as comprehending the inputthat individual differences in such factors as insufficient L2 proficiency and/or cognitive processing limitations, like speed and working memory influence L2 learners real-time processing of the target input. Under these circumstances, L2 learners of for instance, a higher working memory capacity or greater proficiency are more likely to process the input like native speakers. Otherwise, learners appear to shallow process the input, irrespective of individual variability.
Keywords:
WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY
SUBJECT-OBJECT AMBIGUITIES
LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION
COGNITIVE CONTROL
WH-QUESTIONS
READING SPAN
GARDEN PATHS
L2
PLAUSIBILITY
ENGLISH

Journal

Language Learning cover
Language Learning
IF:
4.2
Papers:
1.5K
Citations:
6.0K

Organization

U
university of york - uk
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 15
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Optionen für die Integration von Power-to-Fuel in den Energiewendeprozess aus einer sozioökonomischen Perspektive
err2016-12-01
err0
errOAAI
errChristian Schnülle; Arnim von Gleich; Stefan Gößling-Reisemann; Kasper Kisjes; Igor Nikolic; Torben Stührmann; Pablo Thier
errShare
errSave
Emotional skills in adolescents’ attitudes towards diversity: Regression models vs qualitative comparative analysis models
err2021-01-14
err0
PREAI
errMarian Guasp-Coll; Diego Navarro-Mateu; Laura Lacomba-Trejo; María del Carmen Giménez-Espert; Vicente Javier Prado-Gascó
errShare
errSave
Statistical Learning and Language: An Individual Differences Study
err2011-02-07
err249
PREAI
errMisyak, Jennifer B.; Christiansen, Morten H.
errShare
errSave
Theory and Modelling of Time Dependent Phenomena in the Plasma Edge
err2007-03-12
err0
PREAI
errD. P. Coster; R. Schneider; J. Neuhauser; B. Braams; D. Reiter
errShare
errSave
Prevalence rate of DSM mental disorders among adolescents living in residential group homes of the French Child Welfare System
err2011-10-01
err0
PREAI
errGuillaume Bronsard; Christophe Lançon; Anderson Loundou; Pascal Auquier; Marcel Rufo; Marie-Claude Siméoni
errShare
errSave
Invasiveness of plants is predicted by size and fecundity in the native range
err2015-04-17
err0
errOAAI
errKim Jelbert; Iain Stott; Robbie A. McDonald; Dave Hodgson
errShare
errSave
researcher View more