arrow
Return

Judging foreign startups

delete2023-02-06
delete0
PRE
AI
N
Nataliya Langburd Wright *
R
Rembrand Koning
T
Tarun Khanna
DOI:10.1002/smj.3490delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Research Summary: Can accelerators pick the most promising startup ideas no matter their provenance? Using unique data from a global accelerator where judges are randomly assigned to evaluate startups headquartered across the globe, we show that judges are less likely to recommend startups headquartered outside their home region by 4 percentage points. Back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest this discount leads judges to pass over 1 in 20 promising startups. Despite this systematic discount, we find that-in contrast to many past studies-judges can discern startup quality and are no better at evaluating local firms. These differences emerge because the pool of startups accelerator judges evaluate is both broader and less local, suggesting that judging ability depends on the composition of the companies they are tasked with evaluating.Managerial Summary: Accelerators often seek the most promising startup ideas. Yet, they can only do so if their judges can discern the quality of startups, both local and foreign to them, without systematic bias. We used unique data from a global accelerator where judges are assigned to evaluate startups headquartered across the globe and find that, while judges can detect the quality of both local and foreign startups, they discount startups foreign to them, hindering their ability to accept the best startup ideas. As venture capitalists increasingly source startups from accelerators, this foreign discounting can result in investors passing over promising ideas. However, simple measures like reducing the threshold for startups evaluated by foreign judges may help reduce judges' foreign discounting and enable picking the best companies.
Keywords:
entrepreneurial financing
entrepreneurship and strategy
global strategy
innovation
international

Journal

Strategic Management Journal cover
Strategic Management Journal
IF:
7.2
Papers:
3.4K
Citations:
4.6W

Organization

H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.5W
Papers: 22.0W
Citations: 28.7W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
errShare
errSave
Entrepreneurship as Experimentation
err2014-08-01
err304
errOAAI
errKerr, William R.; Nanda, Ramana; Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew
errShare
errSave
Cost of experimentation and the evolution of venture capital
err2018-06-01
err118
PREAI
errEwens, Michael; Nanda, Ramana; Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew
errShare
errSave
Traps in undoped semi-insulating InP obtained by high temperature annealing
err1996-05-01
err0
PREAI
errG. Marrakchi; K. Cherkaoui; A. Karoui; G. Hirt; G. Müller
errShare
errSave
Who do we invent for? Patents by women focus more on women's health, but few women get to invent
errSCIENCE
IF45.8
err2021-06-18
err77
errOAAI
errKoning, Rembrand; Samila, Sampsa; Ferguson, John-Paul
errShare
errSave
Interfacial equilibria at a goethite aqueous interface in the presence of amino acids
err2024-09-04
err0
PREAI
errD. Kovačević; A. Čop; A. Bradetic; N. Kallay; A. Pohlmeier; H. -D. Narres; H. Lewandowski
errShare
errSave
researcher View more