arrow
Return

Memory-Optimized Block Compression for High-Speed Memory Testing

delete2026-04-28
delete0
PRE
AI
G
Gyeonggyu Park
D
Duyeon Won
J
Juyong Lee
Y
Youngki Moon
S
Sungho Kang
DOI:10.1109/TVLSI.2026.3686478delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
In memory testing, test vectors are generated by automatic test equipment (ATE) during testing. To detect diverse faults introduced in modern memories, flexibility in implementing diverse test conditions is required. However, the complex operations for test vector generation during testing make it challenging to achieve high-speed testing and high flexibility simultaneously. In vector memory (VM)-based testing, complex operations are mitigated because test vectors are pre-generated and applied directly to the memory under test (MUT) during testing. However, test vector compression is necessary to address the limited capacity and data-loading speed of the VM. Although conventional code-based compression methods for logic testing are applicable to memory test vectors, low compression ratios are observed due to fundamental differences between logic and memory test vectors. To achieve both high-speed testing and high flexibility, a memory-optimized block compression (MOBC) is proposed. Each field, comprising inputs with the same functional role, is compressed independently by exploiting fundamental characteristics of memory test vectors (e.g., field-specific characteristics and timing constraints). On average, a 36.3% higher compression ratio is achieved compared to conventional compression methods. In addition, the MOBC decoder achieves a higher operating frequency than conventional test vector generators, regardless of the test conditions.
Keywords:
Automatic test equipment (ATE)
code-based compression
high-speed memory
memory testing
test compression

Journal

I
IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
IF:
3.1
Papers:
459
Citations:
7.3K

Organization

Y
Yonsei University
Scholars:
4.8W
Papers: 4.6W
Citations: 5.2W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

No cited papers available