arrow
Return

Mixed integer linear programming for maximum-parsimony phylogeny inference

delete2008-07-01
delete21
delete
OA
AI
S
S. Sridhar *
F
Fumei Lam
G
Guy E. Blelloch
R
R. Ravi
R
Russell Schwartz
DOI:10.1109/TCBB.2008.26delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Reconstruction of phylogenetic trees is a fundamental problem in computational biology. While excellent heuristic methods are available for many variants of this problem, new advances in phylogeny inference will be required if we are to be able to continue making effective use of the rapidly growing stores of variation data now being gathered. In this paper, we present two integer linear programming (ILP) formulations for finding the most parsimonious phylogenetic tree from a set of binary variation data. One method uses a flow-based formulation that can produce exponential numbers of variables and constraints in the worst case. The method has, however, proven to be extremely efficient in practice on data sets that are well beyond the reach of the available provably efficient methods, solving several large mtDNA and Y-chromosome instances within a few seconds and giving provably optimal results in times competitive with fast heuristics that cannot guarantee optimality. An alternative formulation establishes that the problem can be solved with a polynomial-sized ILP. We further present a Web server that was developed based on the exponential-sized ILP that performs fast maximum parsimony inferences and serves as a front end to a database of precomputed phylogenies spanning the human genome.
Keywords:
graph algorithms
trees
biology and genetics
linear programming
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

I
IEEE-ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
IF:
3.4
Papers:
3.3K
Citations:
6.4K

Organization

B
Brown University
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 3.2W
C
Carnegie Mellon University
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 2.7W