.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Motion Analysis and Performance Improved Method for 3D LiDAR Sensor Data Compression
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1109/TITS.2019.2956066.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Continuous point cloud data is being used more and more widely in practical applications such as mapping, localization and object detection in autonomous driving systems, but due to the huge volume of data involved, sharing and storing this data is currently expensive and difficult. One possible solution is the development of more efficient methods of compressing the data. Other researchers have proposed converting 3D point cloud data into 2D images, or using tree structures to store the data. In a previous study targeting streaming point cloud data, we proposed an MPEG-like compression method which utilizes simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) results to simulate LiDAR's operating process. In this paper, instead of imitating MPEG, we propose new strategy for more efficient reference frame distribution and more natural frame prediction, and use a different algorithm to encode the residual, greatly improving the algorithm's performance and its stability in different scenarios. We also discuss how various parameters affect compression performance. Using our proposed method, streaming point cloud data collected by LiDAR sensors can be compressed to 1/50th of its original size, with only 2 cm of Root Mean Square Error for each detected point. We evaluate our proposed method by comparing its performance with several other existing point cloud compression methods in three different driving scenarios, demonstrating that our proposed method outperforms them.
Keywords:
Three-dimensional displays
Laser radar
Two dimensional displays
Redundancy
Data compression
Image coding
Simultaneous localization and mapping
Point cloud
data compression
3D LiDAR
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
8.4
Papers:
9.5K
Citations:
6.3W