.png){kind=icon}
Return
Nonstandard Errors
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1111/jofi.13337.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty-nonstandard errors (NSEs). We study NSEs by letting 164 teams test the same hypotheses on the same data. NSEs turn out to be sizable, but smaller for more reproducible or higher rated research. Adding peer-review stages reduces NSEs. We further find that this type of uncertainty is underestimated by participants.
Keywords:
CROSS-SECTION
ANALYSTS
RISK
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
9.5
Papers:
4.0K
Citations:
5.0W
Organization
View more organizations
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveMany Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect ResultsOAAI
OAAIShareSave
ShareSaveShareSave View more