arrow
Return

Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: a randomised experiment

delete2008-07-17
delete36
PRE
AI
D
David Budgen *
B
Barbara Kitchenham
S
Stuart Charters
M
Mark Turner
P
Pearl Brereton
S
Stephen Linkman
DOI:10.1007/s10664-008-9075-7delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
When conducting a systematic literature review, researchers usually determine the relevance of primary studies on the basis of the title and abstract. However, experience indicates that the abstracts for many software engineering papers are of too poor a quality to be used for this purpose. A solution adopted in other domains is to employ structured abstracts to improve the quality of information provided. This study consists of a formal experiment to investigate whether structured abstracts are more complete and easier to understand than non-structured abstracts for papers that describe software engineering experiments. We constructed structured versions of the abstracts for a random selection of 25 papers describing software engineering experiments. The 64 participants were each presented with one abstract in its original unstructured form and one in a structured form, and for each one were asked to assess its clarity (measured on a scale of 1 to 10) and completeness (measured with a questionnaire that used 18 items). Based on a regression analysis that adjusted for participant, abstract, type of abstract seen first, knowledge of structured abstracts, software engineering role, and preference for conventional or structured abstracts, the use of structured abstracts increased the completeness score by 6.65 (SE 0.37, p < 0.001) and the clarity score by 2.98 (SE 0.23, p < 0.001). 57 participants reported their preferences regarding structured abstracts: 13 (23%) had no preference; 40 (70%) preferred structured abstracts; four preferred conventional abstracts. Many conventional software engineering abstracts omit important information. Our study is consistent with studies from other disciplines and confirms that structured abstracts can improve both information content and readability. Although care must be taken to develop appropriate structures for different types of article, we recommend that Software Engineering journals and conferences adopt structured abstracts.
Keywords:
structured abstract
randomised controlled laboratory experiment

Journal

Empirical Software Engineering cover
Empirical Software Engineering
IF:
3.6
Papers:
2.0K
Citations:
5.3K

Organization

K
Keele University
Scholars:
5.4K
Papers: 5.7K
Citations: 6.9K
D
Durham University
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 2.1W
L
lincoln university - new zealand
Scholars:
1.8K
Papers: 1.9K
Citations: 2
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain
err2007-04-01
err1.4K
errOAAI
errBrereton, Pearl; Kitchenham, Barbara A.; Budgen, David; Turner, Mark; Khalil, Mohamed
errShare
errSave
RF transceiver and wireless calibration of on-chip frequency reference for a true single chip radio
err2008-06-01
err0
PREAI
errY. Ding; Y. Su; C. Cao; J.-J. Lin; H. Wu; M. Hwang; R. Fox; J. E. Brewer; K. K. O
errShare
errSave
err2003-01-01
err0
PREAI
errJ. Tack; G. Vantrappen; G. Huyberechts; D. Sifrim; J. Janssens; R. Van Overstraeten
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering
err2005-09-01
err395
errOAAI
errSjoberg, DIK; Hannay, JE; Hansen, O; Kampenes, VB; Karahasanovic, A; Liborg, NK; Rekdal, AC
errShare
errSave
researcher View more