.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Problem solving team interventions: Web-based and consultant-based experimental evaluations
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101279.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This research was designed to develop, implement, and evaluate an assessment and intervention protocol to increase problem -solving teams' (PSTs) adoption and implementation of evidencebased practices aimed at students with disruptive behavior problems. Participants included 15 PSTs. Adopting single -case design methodology, we examined whether a customized set of assessment and intervention consultant -led intervention procedures could be used to improve the activities, process, and recommendations of PSTs compared to a web -based intervention. We were interested in evaluating two variations of the problem -solving model based on the team initiated problem -solving (TIPS) approach. TIPS includes steps to successful problem solving and solution implementation for student academic and behavioral concerns. Based on visual analysis and statistical randomization tests, we found that a teleconsultation web -based model of PST intervention was not effective in improving the functioning of the PST. In contrast, a customized, consultation -led intervention model with PST facilitators that followed this approach was found to be effective in improving both the foundation and thoroughness of the PST's problem solving. Implications of future PST improvement models for practice and research are discussed.
Keywords:
Team decision making
Problem -solving teams
Problem -solving practices
Procedural integrity of problem solving
Data -based decision making
Evidenced -based interventions
Journal
IF:
1.8
Papers:
2.2K
Citations:
950
