.png){kind=icon}
Return
Process and post-process: A discursive history
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00127-3.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
While the term post-process can be useful as a heuristic for expanding the scope of the field of second language writing, the uncritical adoption of this and other keywords can have serious consequences because they often oversimplify the historical complexity of the intellectual developments they describe. In order to provide a critical understanding of the term post-process in its own historical context, this article examines the history of process and post-process in composition studies, focusing on the ways in which terms such as current-traditional rhetoric, process, and post-process have contributed to the discursive construction of reality. Based on this analysis, I argue that the use of the term post-process in the context of L2 writing needs to be guided by a critical awareness of the discursive construction process. I further argue that the notion of post-process needs to be understood not as the rejection of process but as the recognition of the multiplicity of L2 writing theories and pedagogies. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
post-process
process
current-traditional rhetoric
discursive construction
composition studies
history
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
4.5
Papers:
991
Citations:
3.4K
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSave
ShareSave
ShareSaveShareSave
View more