arrow
Return

REFLEXIVE QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

delete2025-10-01
delete7
PRE
AI
J
Jukka Luoma *
J
Joel Hietanen
DOI:10.5465/amr.2021.0234delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Quantitative research relies on measurement and inference procedures that are relatively independent of the researcher's interpretations, which has given it a reputation as an impartial and reproducible approach for evaluating the scientific worth of management theories. This reputation has recently been called into question. Scholars increasingly doubt knowledge claims based on quantitative research and are concerned about questionable research practices. The proposed solutions revolve around developing and enforcing methodological procedures aiming to reveal and limit the researcher's subjective choices in the research process. We offer an alternative means to address the issue: reflexivity. Reflexive quantitative research assumes that the researcher's active role throughout the research process should be taken as a methodological starting point rather than an obstacle to meaningful scholarly inquiry. We reinterpret the process of quantitative management research through Richard Rorty's pragmatism and specify how reflexivity may arise in its different phases. Reflexive quantitative research is conscious of the possibility of multiple purposes for scholarship and, consequently, calls for a pluralistic and contingent view of epistemology and methodological standards. Reflexivity offers new options for making scholarly contributions with quantitative methods, enabling richer theorizing and offering a novel path out of the methodological crisis of quantitative research.
Keywords:
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
THEORY CONSTRUCTION
REPLICATION
SCIENCE
ORGANIZATION
KNOWLEDGE
CRISIS
ETHICS
REPLICABILITY
ANALYSTS

Journal

Academy of Management Review cover
Academy of Management Review
IF:
13.9
Papers:
1.2K
Citations:
4.2W

Organization

A
Aalto University
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 2.1W
U
university of helsinki
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 51
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Tales of the Field
err
IF0
err2011-01-01
err0
PREAI
errJohn Van Maanen
errShare
errSave
Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis
err2016-09-29
err750
errOAAI
errSteegen, Sara; Tuerlinckx, Francis; Gelman, Andrew; Vanpaemel, Wolf
errShare
errSave
A new approach to data access and research transparency (DART)
err2020-04-21
err31
errOAAI
errBeugelsdijk, Sjoerd; van Witteloostuijn, Arjen; Meyer, Klaus E.
errShare
errSave
Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results
err2018-08-23
err405
errOAAI
errSilberzahn, R.; Uhlmann, E. L.; Martin, D. P.; Anselmi, P.; Aust, F.; Awtrey, E.; Bahnik, S.; Bai, F.; Bannard, C.; Bonnier, E.; Carlsson, R.; Cheung, F.; Christensen, G.; Clay, R.; Craig, M. A.; Dalla Rosa, A.; Dam, L.; Evans, M. H.; Cervantes, I. Flores; Fong, N.; Gamez-Djokic, M.; Glenz, A.; Gordon-McKeon, S.; Heaton, T. J.; Hederos, K.; Heene, M.; Mohr, A. J. Hofelich; Hogden, F.; Hui, K.; Johannesson, M.; Kalodimos, J.; Kaszubowski, E.; Kennedy, D. M.; Lei, R.; Lindsay, T. A.; Liverani, S.; Madan, C. R.; Molden, D.; Molleman, E.; Morey, R. D.; Mulder, L. B.; Nijstad, B. R.; Pope, N. G.; Pope, B.; Prenoveau, J. M.; Rink, F.; Robusto, E.; Roderique, H.; Sandberg, A.; Schlueter, E.; Schoenbrodt, F. D.; Sherman, M. F.; Sommer, S. A.; Sotak, K.; Spain, S.; Spoerlein, C.; Stafford, T.; Stefanutti, L.; Tauber, S.; Ullrich, J.; Vianello, M.; Wagenmakers, E-J; Witkowiak, M.; Yoon, S.; Nosek, B. A.
errShare
errSave
Reflexivity in management research
err2003-07-03
err266
PREAI
errJohnson, P; Duberley, J
errShare
errSave
researcher View more