Return
STRUCTURAL REPRESENTATIONS IN KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION
DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.601.png)
Abstract
En 中文
Multidimensional scaling (MDS) and Pathfinder techniques for assessing changes in the structural representation (RP) of a knowledge (KN) domain as a function of learning were compared and evaluated. Relatedness ratings, collected from university students before and after they studied a textbook, were analyzed with both MDS and Pathfinder procedures. Relatedness ratings were collected from the students' instructors, and the similarity between the instructors' structural RPs and those of their students provided evidence of learning. A conceptual test captured the ability of the techniques to predict concept-to-concept learning. Students' networks and dimensional RPs varied depending on whether they had (a) already studied the textbook and (b) learned the material. Comparisons between student and expert similarity measures indicated that multidimensional scaling and graph theoretic approaches are valid techniques. MDS represented global properties of KN, whereas graph networks captured local conceptual relations.
Keywords:
ORGANIZATION
PERCEPTION
MEMORY
RECALL
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
6.4
Papers:
4.2K
Citations:
2.2W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
No cited papers available

