arrow
Return

Task as research construct

delete2005-08-11
delete100
PRE
AI
P
Paul Seedhouse
DOI:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The article examines task as research construct as predominantly conceived in terms of task-as-workplan in the task-based learning/second language acquisition literature. It is suggested that task has weak construct validity and ontology in an overwhelmingly quantitative paradigm because the construct has a split personality. Conceptualization is based on the task-as-workplan, but data are gathered from the task-in-process. The article adopts a conversation analysis perspective and demonstrates that the two can be very different. It is proposed that a secure basis for task as research construct and for the quantification of discoursal data is attainable only by switching the conceptual and methodological focus to task-in-process.
Keywords:
ACQUISITION
JAPANESE
SLA
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Language Learning cover
Language Learning
IF:
4.2
Papers:
1.5K
Citations:
6.0K

Organization

No organization information available