arrow
Return

The Interaction Between Knowledge Codification and Knowledge-Sharing Networks

delete2010-12-01
delete36
PRE
AI
L
Liu De *
G
Gautamn Ray
A
Andrew B. Whinston
DOI:10.1287/isre.1080.0217delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Current knowledge management (KM) technologies and strategies advocate two different approaches: knowledge codification and knowledge-sharing networks. However, the extant literature has paid limited attention to the interaction between them. This research draws on the literature on formal modeling of networks to examine the interaction between knowledge codification and knowledge-sharing networks. The analysis suggests that an increase in codification may damage existing network-sharing ties. Anticipating that, individuals may hoard their knowledge to protect their network ties, even when there are nontrivial rewards for codification. We find that despite the aforementioned tension between the codification and the network approach, a firm may still benefit from combining the two approaches. Specifically, when the future sharing potential between knowledge workers is high, a combination of the two approaches may outperform a codification-only or a network-only approach because the codification reward causes fewer network ties to break down, and the benefit from increased codification can offset the loss of some network ties. However, when the future sharing potential is low, an increase in codification reward can quickly break down the whole network. Thus, firms may be better off by pursuing a codification-only or a network-only strategy.
Keywords:
knowledge management
codification
knowledge-sharing network
sharing potential
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Information Systems Research cover
Information Systems Research
IF:
5.1
Papers:
1.4K
Citations:
1.4W

Organization

U
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Scholars:
3.7W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 58
U
University of Kentucky
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 41
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

errShare
errSave
Approaches to robust pole assignment
err1989-01-01
err0
PREAI
errRalph Byers; Stephen G. Nash
errShare
errSave
Use of lead‐glazed ceramics is the main factor associated to high lead in blood levels in two Mexican rural communities
err1994-05-01
err0
PREAI
errMagdalena Rojas‐López; Carlos Santos‐Burgoa; Camilo Ríos; Mauricio Hernández‐Avila; Isabelle Romieu
errShare
errSave
researcher View more