1
Back
R

Research Integrity and Peer Review

IF10.7
Papers162
Citations1176
Journal Papers 156
Publication Date
delete
Follow-up investigation of ethics approvals and regulatory compliance in publications from the IHU-Mi
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-08-12
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteFabrice Frank; Elisabeth M. Bik; Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz; Jérôme Barriere; Éric Billy; Véronique Saada; Alexander Samuel; Jacques Robert; Lonni Besançon
deleteShare
deleteSave
Correction: Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-08-11
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteTamarinde Haven; Joeri Tijdink; Brian Martinson; Lex Bouter; Frans Oort
deleteShare
deleteSave
Potential reverse spin bias of cannabinoids versus pharmaceutical analgesics for pain treatment: a systematic review based critical interpretive synthesis of meta-analyses
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-08-05
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteJoshua Aviram; Yulia Gendler
deleteShare
deleteSave
TOP 2025: An update to the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-08-05
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteSean Grant; Katherine S. Corker; David Mellor; Suzanne L. K. Stewart; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Aidan G. Cashin; Malgorzata Lagisz; David Moher; Daniel Umpierre; Virginia Barbour; Stuart Buck; Gary S. Collins; Haley F. Hazlett; Iain Hrynaszkiewicz; Carole J. Lee; Timothy H. Parker; Melissa L. Rethlefsen; Elaine Toomey; Brian A. Nosek
deleteShare
deleteSave
From assistance to accountability: a systematic scoping review of LLMs in responsible scholarly review, research integrity, and scientometrics
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-08-05
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteFateme Mohammadkhani; Farshid Danesh
deleteShare
deleteSave
The barrier is purely financial: analysis of the acceptance rate and peer review practice of predatory journals using AI generated papers
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-08-04
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteKieran Poland; Patrick Davies
deleteShare
deleteSave
Preventing and detecting fraud in web-based surveys with in-person recruitment: lessons for data integrity
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-08-03
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteApril M. Ballard; Joy Monroe; Sue Sullivan; Shannon Self-Brown
deleteShare
deleteSave
Correction: Who deserves credit, who receives credit? A cross-sectional survey on the handling of co-authorship in medical dissertations in Germany
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-27
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteLaura Klempp; Nadin Zerin Tanriverdi; Adrian Loerbroks; Niklas Juth; Nils Hansson
deleteShare
deleteSave
Why researchers cut corners: motivations, pressures, and personality in questionable research practices
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-17
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteRobin Brooker
deleteShare
deleteSave
A systematic map of generative AI guidelines and reporting in ecology and evolutionary biology: towards the framework of AI disclosure for Improved Transparency (AIdIT)
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-11
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteSzymon M. Drobniak; Martyna Cendrowska-Pek; Agnieszka Gudowska; Katarzyna Janas; Paweł Podkowa; Karolina Skorb; Monika Gronowska; Wioleta Oleś; Faina Bikmurzina; Natalia Boroń; Magdalena Zagalska-Neubauer; Shinichi Nakagawa; Małgorzata Łagisz; Aneta Arct; Joanna Rutkowska
deleteShare
deleteSave
Sex and gender reporting in Australian cancer clinical trials: are we doing enough?
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-08
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteVikneswary Batumalai; Gowri Shivasabesan; Cheryl Carcel; Carole A. Harris; Sue Haupt; Eng-Siew Koh; Angela Liao; Shalini K. Vinod; Mei Ling Yap
deleteShare
deleteSave
Retraction and correction of scientific articles due to conflicts of interest: a cross‑sectional analysis of the retraction watch database
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-08
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteRužica Bočina; Antonija Mijatović; Ana Marušić
deleteShare
deleteSave
Prioritising measures and interventions to strengthen research reproducibility: a Delphi consultation study
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-03
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteDora Pejdo; Ivan Buljan; Ana Marušić
deleteShare
deleteSave
What influences whether researchers adhere to healthcare reporting guidelines successfully? A thematic synthesis
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-02
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteJames Harwood; Charlotte Albury; Jennifer de Beyer; Zhaoxiang Bian; Yuting Duan; Shona Kirtley; Michael Schlüssel; Lingyun Zhao; Gary S. Collins
deleteShare
deleteSave
Behavior characteristics of peer reviewers in medical journals: a survey from China
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-01
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteGuie Liu; Yuan Tian; Jing Peng; Lianyang Zhang; Lei Li
deleteShare
deleteSave
Potential and limitations of a large language model in the statistical review of comparative categorical data: an exploratory study of structured prompt-guided approach
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-01
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteMin Dong; Xuemei Liu; Yunmei Luo; Yuanxiang Zeng; Fang Fei; Liang Du
deleteShare
deleteSave
Publication integrity and industry influences on the editorial process: a case study
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-07-01
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteEvan D. Kharasch; Michael M. Todd; Jean-Francois Pittet; William L. Lanier
deleteShare
deleteSave
Self-reported availability of research data in American Psychological Association journal articles: a cross-sectional investigation
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-06-30
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteClaire C. Guyatt; Gert Storms
deleteShare
deleteSave
Indirect measurement of research misconduct among Iranian postgraduate students of medical sciences using the unmatched count technique
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-06-28
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteSanaz Omidi; Younes Mohammadi; Fariba Fatehi; Abouzar Raeisvandi; Fatemeh Ebrahimi; Tina Lari; Hanieh Moradi; Marzieh Otogara; Masoumeh Javaheri
deleteShare
deleteSave
Expert opinion in decision-making: a systematic review of methods and the INTEGRITY framework for incorporating expert consultation into research
deleteResearch Integrity and Peer Review
IF10.7
delete2026-06-24
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteLesley Uttley; Louise Falzon; Nicholas Latimer; Thea Uttley; Shijie Ren
deleteShare
deleteSave