logo
科言猫学术研究的AI总结
language
手机端手机端
  • Phone Feature微信小程序
简体中文简体中文
notice消息通知
博客博客
arrow
返回期刊详情
Research Evaluation 封面图

Research Evaluation

IF2.5
论文数132
被引数1902
期刊论文 132
发表时间
delete
Does really affects the highly cited papers to the Journal Impact Factor高引用论文对期刊影响因子真的有影响吗
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-10-27
delete0
PREAI
deleteEvaristo Jiménez-Contreras; Yiming Liu; Mariano J Valderrama; Rut Lucas-Domínguez
delete分享
delete收藏
When ‘how many jobs?’ becomes the metric: assessing the public value of social science from a low-investment research system当“有多少工作？”成为衡量标准：评估低投入研究体系下社会科学的公共价值
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-10-23
delete0
PREAI
deleteAngel Aedo
delete分享
delete收藏
Evidence of animal methods bias in manuscript peer review: Results from a survey of in vitro researchers and bibliometric analyses动物实验方法偏倚在稿件同行评审中的证据：体外研究者和文献计量分析的结果
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-10-23
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteCatharine E Krebs; Ignacio J Tripodi; Pandora Pound; Ron Baron; Francesca Pistollato; Helder Constantino
delete分享
delete收藏
Core or periphery? Research productivity of Chinese engineering PhDs trained in the USA and Japan核心或边缘？美国和日本培养的中国工程学博士的研究生产力
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-10-21
delete0
PREAI
deleteShuoyang Meng; Yukari Matsuzuka; Akiyoshi Yonezawa; Wenqin Shen
delete分享
delete收藏
Language hierarchies and gender inequalities: the coverage of OpenAlex and the Web of Science语言层级与性别不平等：OpenAlex和Web of Science的覆盖情况
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-10-21
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteCarolina Pradier; Diego Kozlowski; Alysson Fernandes Mazoni; Vincent Larivière
delete分享
delete收藏
Uruguay: multi-level evaluation governance and burn-out amid an autonomist tradition乌拉圭：多层级评估治理与自主主义传统中的职业倦怠
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-10-20
delete0
PREAI
deleteFernanda Beigel; Soledad Gomez
delete分享
delete收藏
Metric pressure, signal decoupling, and the scholarly record: a multilevel framework with a journal-level design agenda for research evaluation计量压力、信号解耦与学术记录：一个用于研究评估的多层次框架及期刊层面的设计议程
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-10-06
delete0
PREAI
deleteHong Yan
delete分享
delete收藏
Disciplinary diversity, group size, and researcher rank as drivers of scientific performance: evidence from social science research groups in Colombia学科多样性、团队规模和研究人员级别作为科学绩效的驱动因素：来自哥伦比亚社会科学研究团队的证据
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-09-23
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteDiana Rocio Moreno-Hernandez; Emanuel Kulczycki; Julián D Cortés
delete分享
delete收藏
Mapping stakeholder engagement in academic research: evidence from Polish impact case studies映射学术研究中的利益相关者参与：来自波兰影响案例研究的证据
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-09-14
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteKamila Lewandowska; Zofia Smolarska-Korkmaz; Ewa Zegler-Poleska; Alfredo Yergos-Yergos
delete分享
delete收藏
Raising the bar and setting a ceiling: the paradox of stimulating inter- and transdisciplinary research through funding提高标准与设定上限：通过资助激励跨学科与超学科研究的悖论
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-09-11
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteAnnemarie Horn; Lotte Krabbenborg
delete分享
delete收藏
Unsolicited invitations and questionable publishing: a systematic review of ‘predatory’ journal and conferences email solicitations未请自来的邀请和可疑出版：对“掠夺性”期刊和会议电子邮件邀请的系统综述
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-29
delete0
PREAI
deleteAndrés Fernández-Ramos; Rubén Comas-Forgas; Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo; Carmen Touza-Garma
delete分享
delete收藏
The four discourses of transdisciplinary research assessment—a comprehensive review of evaluation frameworks and their normative underpinnings跨学科研究评估的四种话语——对评估框架及其规范性基础的全面综述
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-25
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteJakob Lundgren; Björn Hammarfelt; Anders Hylmö; Pablo Lillo Cea; Gustaf Nelhans; Jonatan Nästesjö; Eugenia Perez Vico
delete分享
delete收藏
A method of constructing a hybrid indicator for interactions between science and society构建科学与社会互动的混合指标的方法
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-24
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteAnni Tarkiainen; Heikki Laitinen; Katri Rintamäki
delete分享
delete收藏
How evaluators construct assessment rationales for non-traditionally submitted research outputs评估者如何为非传统提交形式的研究成果构建评估理由
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-18
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteAleksandra Thomson; Gemma E Derrick
delete分享
delete收藏
Conditional academic citizenship: how editorial interactions legitimate or devalue unpaid peer-review labour学术公民身份的条件性：编辑互动如何使无偿同行评审劳动获得合法性或贬值
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-14
delete0
PREAI
deleteSiliang Yu
delete分享
delete收藏
Journal-tiering systems as institutional devices in research evaluation: CAS, JCR, and rule-based governance in Chinese universities期刊分级体系作为科研评价中的制度性工具：中国大学的CAS、JCR与基于规则的治理
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-11
delete0
PREAI
deleteYue Song; Zhongshuai Li; Yuan Gao
delete分享
delete收藏
Beyond metric reductionism: assessment creep as an emerging risk of research evaluation reform超越度量还原主义：评估蔓延作为研究评价改革的新兴风险
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-08
delete0
PREAI
deleteSerhii Nazarovets
delete分享
delete收藏
How grant evaluation criteria shape journal value: the case of SciELO in Fondecyt科研经费评估标准如何塑造期刊价值：SciELO在Fondecyt案例中的应用
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-07
delete0
PREAI
deleteErwin Krauskopf
delete分享
delete收藏
Exploring the paths to societal impact of academic development cooperation: a stakeholder engagement perspective探索学术发展合作对社会影响的路径：利益相关者参与视角
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-04
delete0
PREAI
deleteJoshua Eykens; Rolf Hvidtfeldt; Walter Ysebaert
delete分享
delete收藏
What is local research? Towards a multidimensional framework linking theory and methods什么是本地研究？迈向一个连接理论与方法的多维框架
deleteResearch Evaluation
IF2.5
delete2026-08-03
delete0
deleteOAAI
deleteVictoria Di Césare; Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
delete分享
delete收藏