.png){kind=icon}
返回
AUTHENTICITY
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.5465/annals.2017.0047.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The concept of authenticity informs a number of central topics in management studies. On the surface, it might seem that a consensus exists about its meaning; there is indeed widespread agreement that authenticity refers to that which is real or genuine or true. Below the surface, however, there is much less agreement; scholars use the same lexical term but often approach the concept from different perspectives and apply different meanings. This review outlines three fundamental but distinct perspectives found in the literature: authenticity as (1) consistency between an entity's internal values and its external expressions, (2) conformity of an entity to the norms of its social category, and (3) connection between an entity and a person, place, or time as claimed. The aim of this review was to critically appraise the various research themes within each perspective, highlighting similarities, differences, and relationships between them. In doing so, this review represents an initial step toward an integrated framework of authenticity, which provides new insights into our understanding of the existing literature and a useful guide for future research.
Keyword:
SELF-CONCEPT CONSISTENCY
TRUE SELF
EMOTIONAL LABOR
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
SECURITIES ANALYSTS
NEED SATISFACTION
MEDIATING ROLE
ROLE POWER
SERVICE
WORK
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
16.5
论文数:
345
被引数:
1.0W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏分享收藏Bringing Back the Bank: Local Renewal and Agency through Community Banking带回银行: 通过社区银行进行本地更新和代理.png)
ORGANIZATION STUDIES
ORGANIZATION STUDIESIF5.2
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容