.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
This article addresses the question of what might constitute Critical Human Resource Management (CHRM). Consideration is given to ideas from critics of HRM, both from within the field and those external to it, in particular Critical Management Studies, and to mainstream scholars who have voiced concerns regarding the moribund and limited nature of mainstream HRM. CHRM is advanced in order that HRM might be better contextualized within the prevailing socio-economic order of capitalism; managerialist assumptions and language may be denaturalized and challenged; and that voices excluded in mainstream HRM, such as workers (especially minorities and those in non-standard employment), trade unions and those involved outside large Western corporations, may be heard. The analytical coherence of CHRM builds from a theorization of the employment relationship and requires acknowledgement of the sociological, psychological, economic, political and ethical aspects of working, managing and organizing. In our view, HRM research will be enriched by the variety of methodological and theoretical approaches of CHRM and by the inclusion of a wider range of different research settings and research questions. However, a fruitful and reflexive engagement between CHRM and mainstream HRM seems unlikely until the latter critically assesses rather than assumes the managerial perspective.
Keyword:
critical HRM
critical management studies
employment relationship
reflexive engagement
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.2
论文数:
4.1K
被引数:
4.4K
机构
引用论文
Beyond measuring the human resources management-organizational performance link: Applying critical realist meta-theory.png)
ORGANIZATION.png)
ORGANIZATIONIF3.1
PREAI
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容