.png){kind=icon}
返回
Beyond the systems versus package debate
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.aos.2020.101185.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This discussion paper outlines the wider context from which the systems versus package debate has emerged, and draws on the papers included in this Special Issue to make suggestions for future progress. It argues that much research work has focused on narrow aspects of management control systems and has often detached these from their wider organizational contexts, diminishing its value. Researchers should recognize that management control systems are complex in themselves, and they interact in complex ways with the settings in which they are used. We describe various consequences of this situation and provide suggestions as to how research can be improved. We conclude that there is a need for more field-based studies by academics who are better connected with the world of practice. Only in this way will our research work both lead to better, more reliable, theories of MCS design and use and also be useful to practitioners. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
FIELD EXPERIMENTS
MANAGEMENT
FEEDBACK
TARGETS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
8.4K
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard.png)
ACCOUNTING REVIEW
ACCOUNTING REVIEWIF4.4
PREAI
分享收藏Development of nuclear SNP markers for genetic tracking of Iroko, Milicia excelsa and Milicia regia
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容