arrow
返回

Collaborative learning framework for online stakeholder engagement

delete2015-08-21
delete21
delete
OA
AI
D
Dmitry Khodyakov *
T
Terrance D. Savitsky
S
Siddhartha R. Dalal
DOI:10.1111/hex.12383delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Background Public and stakeholder engagement can improve the quality of both research and policy decision making. However, such engagement poses significant methodological challenges in terms of collecting and analysing input from large, diverse groups. Objective To explain how online approaches can facilitate iterative stakeholder engagement, to describe how input from large and diverse stakeholder groups can be analysed and to propose a collaborative learning framework (CLF) to interpret stakeholder engagement results. Methods We use 'A National Conversation on Reducing the Burden of Suicide in the United States' as a case study of online stakeholder engagement and employ a Bayesian data modelling approach to develop a CLF. Results Our data modelling results identified six distinct stakeholder clusters that varied in the degree of individual articulation and group agreement and exhibited one of the three learning styles: learning towards consensus, learning by contrast and groupthink. Learning by contrast was the most common, or dominant, learning style in this study. Conclusion Study results were used to develop a CLF, which helps explore multitude of stakeholder perspectives; identifies clusters of participants with similar shifts in beliefs; offers an empirically derived indicator of engagement quality; and helps determine the dominant learning style. The ability to detect learning by contrast helps illustrate differences in stakeholder perspectives, which may help policymakers, including Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, make better decisions by soliciting and incorporating input from patients, caregivers, health-care providers and researchers. Study results have important implications for soliciting and incorporating input from stakeholders with different interests and perspectives.
Keyword:
CBPR
collaborative learning
modified delphi
online panel
research priorities
stakeholder engagement
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Health Expectations 封面图
Health Expectations
IF:
3.2
论文数:
3.3K
被引数:
7.6K

机构

R
rand health
学者数:
171
论文数: 124
被引数: 0
RAND Corporation 封面图
RAND Corporation
学者数:
2.8K
论文数: 3.4K
被引数: 3.0K
引用论文

引用论文

err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making
err2002-06-01
err152
PREAI
errLitva, A; Coast, J; Donovan, J; Eyles, J; Shepherd, M; Tacchi, J; Abelson, J; Morgan, K
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容