.png){kind=icon}
返回
Construct and consequential validity for learning analytics based on trace data
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.chb.2020.106457.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This article analyzes the concept of validity to set out key factors bearing on claims about validity in general and particularly regarding learning analytics. Because uses of trace data in learning analytics are increasing rapidly, specific consideration is given to reliability of trace data and their role in claiming validity for interpretations grounded on trace data. This analysis reveals the essential and inescapable role of theory in deciding what trace data should be gathered and how trace data can contribute to recommendations for improving learning, one main goal for generating and using learning analytics.
Keyword:
Validity
Reliability
Learning analytics
Trace data
Self-regulated learning
Theory
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
8.9
论文数:
9.1K
被引数:
5.8W
机构
引用论文
Circular RNA hsa_circ_0002938 (circCRIM1) promotes the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by upregulating transcription factor 12.png)
Neoplasma
OAAI
NeoplasmaIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容