.png){kind=icon}
返回
Debiasing omission neglect
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.016.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Two experiments investigated the effectiveness of two new procedures for improving judgment by increasing sensitivity to missing information. When consumers are insensitive to important missing information, overly extreme product evaluations are formed. However, when consumers are sensitive to important missing information, they form more moderate and appropriate evaluations. Sensitivity to missing information was increased by encouraging consumers to consider their criteria for judgment before receiving product information (Experiment 1) and by asking consumers to rate presented and missing product attributes before providing overall product evaluations (Experiment 2). Both procedures were effective for improving judgment by reducing omission neglect. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
judgment
product evaluation
missing information
debiasing
期刊
IF:
9.8
论文数:
1.0W
被引数:
8.7W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS社会心理研究中的主持人中介变量区分-概念，战略和统计考虑
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容