arrow
返回

Flaws and All: How Mindfulness Reduces Error Hiding by Enhancing Authentic Functioning

delete2022-10-01
delete6
delete
OA
AI
E
Ellen Choi *
H
Hannes Leroy
A
Anya Johnson
H
Helena Nguyen
DOI:10.1037/ocp0000327delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Hiding errors can undermine safety by amplifying the risks of undetected errors. This article extends research on occupational safety by investigating error hiding in hospitals and applies self-determination theory to examine how mindfulness decreases error hiding through authentic functioning. We examined this research model in a randomized control trial (mindfulness training vs. active control group vs. waitlist control group) within a hospital setting. First, we used latent growth modeling to confirm that our variables were related as hypothesized, both statically or cross-sectionally as well as dynamically as they evolved over time. Next, we analyzed whether changes in these variables were a function of the intervention and confirmed the effects of the mindfulness intervention on authentic functioning and indirectly on error hiding. To elaborate on the role of authentic functioning, in a third step, we qualitatively explored the phenomenological experience of change experienced by participants in mindfulness and Pilates training. Our findings reveal that error hiding is attenuated because mindfulness encourages a receptive view of one's whole self, and authentic functioning enables an open and nondefensive way of relating to positive and negative information about oneself. These results add to research on mindfulness in organizations, error hiding, and occupational safety.
Keyword:
mindfulness
authentic functioning
error hiding
intervention

期刊

Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 封面图
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
IF:
3.9
论文数:
761
被引数:
8.2K

机构

T
Toronto Metropolitan University
学者数:
6.0K
论文数: 7.0K
被引数: 6.4K
E
Erasmus University Rotterdam
学者数:
4.6W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 2.4W
E
erasmus university rotterdam - excl erasmus mc
学者数:
5.5K
论文数: 5.7K
被引数: 6
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息