.png){kind=icon}
返回
Group-to-individual problem-solving transfer
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1177/1368430208090645.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Many scientific, educational, business, military, and political groups assume that people who solve problems in groups and teams will solve subsequent problems better as individuals than people without previous group problem-solving experience. In order to assess such group-to-individual transfer, sets of three people solved four letters-to-numbers decoding problems as groups ( G) or individuals ( I) in five conditions: GGGG, GGGI, GGII, GIII, or IIII. Results supported four hypotheses: ( a) groups performed better than individuals, (b) positive group-to-individual transfer occurred, ( c) one group experience was sufficient for transfer, (d) transfer was at the level of group performance ( complete) on problems 2 and 3 but incomplete on problem 4, due to exceptional performance in the GGGG condition.
Keyword:
group-to-individual transfer
letters-to-numbers problems
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
G
IF:
2.3
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
4.5K
机构
引用论文
Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size在字母到数字的问题上，小组的表现要好于最佳个人: 小组规模的影响
PREAI
分享收藏Group-to-individual transfer of learning - Cognitive and social factors.png)
Small Group Research
Small Group ResearchIF1.9
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容