.png){kind=icon}
返回
Multi-stakeholder decision theory
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/s10479-017-2433-3.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Decisions made by people at work often have outcomes for their employer (sales, costs, profits) and for themselves personally (career progression, bonus), which are not perfectly aligned across the choice options. When such misalignment exists, decision-makers at all levels in organizations must evaluate choices in terms of conflicting outcomes across stakeholders. Existing theories of agency and stewardship provide very different answers to this question, and utility theory does not address this question at all: it assumes that the decision maker will act so as to maximize the expected utility of the firm, essentially a pure steward position. Yet we see commonplace practices of incentives and monitoring of people's work and decisions aiming to overcome agency problems, with mixed success in practice. We also sometimes see 'super-agent' choices, of managers lining their own pockets while their organizations lose out. In this study, we propose, develop, mathematically model and illustrate a new theory of decision-making, based on a multiple stakeholder utility function approach, where the argument of that function explicitly includes both the employer's and the employee's utilities as stakeholders. This new approach is shown to be more generalizable than both pure agency and stewardship approaches, within a broad continuum of tradeoff-based decisions.
Keyword:
Utility theory
Multiple stakeholder
Decision making
Agency
Stewardship
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.5
论文数:
8.1K
被引数:
2.1W
机构
引用论文
Domain-Based Scoring in Divergent-Thinking Tests: Validation Evidence in an Occupational Sample
.png){kind=icon}
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容