.png){kind=icon}
返回
Pedagogical plans as communication oriented objects
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.011.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This paper focuses on pedagogical plans intended as objects to support human communication. Its purpose is to describe a structural model for pedagogical plans which can assist both authors and users. The model helps authors to engage in the design of a plan as a communication project and helps users in the process of understanding, customizing, enacting and evaluating an existing plan. A distinctive feature of the model is the adoption of a hierarchical representation where each plan can be represented as a hierarchical network of constituent elementary plans that focus in on more specific parts of the learning process, thus going from more general to more concrete, detailed levels. This makes it possible to approach plan authoring as a top-down process, something that presents considerable advantages. It is a valuable aid for mastering the complexity of design and at the same time represents a maieutic factor that encourages authors to establish levels of conceptualization and abstraction which would otherwise remain unexpressed. The user too comprehends the plan in terms of a top-down process, where the specific steps of a learning activity are seen as originating from more general and abstract conceptualizations. In this way communication and understanding are enhanced and facilitated. The paper provides an easy-to-understand example of a hierarchical plan and describes a prototype tool that has been developed for managing hierarchical plans. Finally some preliminary results are presented from initial application of the model and the associated tool in the context of an international research project on educational innovation in mathematics. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Learning design
Pedagogical planning
Hierarchies
Communication
Flexible authoring
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
C
IF:
10.5
论文数:
5.0K
被引数:
2.9W
机构
引用论文
Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching为什么在教学过程中进行最少的指导不起作用: 对建构主义，发现，基于问题，体验和基于探究的教学失败的分析.png)
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST
OAAI
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGISTIF11.4
OAAI分享收藏Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning交互设计: 设计计算机支持的基于小组的学习的六个步骤COMPUTERS & EDUCATIONOAAI
COMPUTERS & EDUCATIONIF10.5
OAAI分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容