arrow
返回

Performance evaluation: a comparative study between public and private sectors

delete2021-03-03
delete13
PRE
AI
S
Sandra Rolim Ensslin
L
Larissa Marx Welter *
D
Daiana Rafaela Pedersini
DOI:10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0146delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Purpose This study analysed international publications related to the performance evaluation (PE) theme to compare the public and private sectors with a focus on the metrics and a reflection on the consideration of each sector's characteristics. Design/methodology/approach In total, two bibliographic portfolios (BPs) were selected with the aid of the Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C) instrument, and the literature was systematically and critically reviewed to construct a theme literature map; the metrics analysed the performance evaluation systems (PESs) used in the studies and identified each sector's characteristics and PES behaviour based on these characteristics. Findings The two sectors stand out because of the low incidence of articles with cardinal scales, which enable the measurement and identification of the consequences of performance that are below or above the target. The behaviour of the sector characteristics was unusual, especially regarding the user and the organisational structure; it was found that the presence or absence of critical factors, such as communication, may prove to be a differential of success or failure. An absence of the organisation's particularities when designing and using a PES was noted. Originality/value The contributions relate to (1) identification of the public and private sector characteristics based on the selected literature, which helps in understanding the critical success and failure factors of an organisation's PES, especially with regard to metrics adequacy for each context; and (2) verification of the paths taken by the literature in both sectors.
Keyword:
Performance evaluation
Public vs private sector
Metrics
Critical success and failure factors
Review of literature

期刊

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 封面图
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
IF:
3.5
论文数:
778
被引数:
4.4K

机构

U
universidade federal de santa catarina (ufsc)
学者数:
1.5W
论文数: 1.1W
被引数: 9
引用论文

引用论文

Fetal and neonatal brain injury in twins complicated by twin anemia polycythemia sequence
err2022-06-28
err0
PREAI
errHadar Rosen; Ronit Silber; Anat Schwartz; Hagai Avnet; Shlomo Lipitz; Shai Shrot; Chen Hoffmann; Boaz Weisz; Yoav Yinon
err分享
err收藏
Safety Management for MR-Guided Interventions
err2016-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errMikhail Cherkashin; Natalia Berezina; Alexey Serov; Artem Fedorov; Georgy Andreev; Vladymir Kuplevatsky
err分享
err收藏
Sensitivity of doping biomarkers after administration of a single dose testosterone gel
err2017-12-28
err0
PREAI
errJenny Mullen; Annica Börjesson; Oscar Hopcraft; Jenny J. Schulze; Magnus Ericsson; Anders Rane; Mikael Lehtihet; Lena Ekström
err分享
err收藏
Lesions of Porcine Necrotic Ear Syndrome
err1984-03-01
err0
errOAAI
errJ. A. Richardson; R. L. Morter; A. H. Rebar; H. J. Olander
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容