.png){kind=icon}
返回
Primary and secondary creativity
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.011.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Who decides what counts as creative? Although most creativity researchers would acknowledge that both individuals and broader social audiences can offer interpretations about creativity, the way in which researchers tend to conceptualize and study creativity typically focuses on either an individual or a social perspective. Those who focus on individual interpretations may treat the social superficially (if at all), whereas those who focus on social judgments risk minimizing or erasing the role of the individual. Consequently, the question of 'Creativity for whom?' too often divides creativity research. In this article, we briefly review recent work in the field of creativity studies that falls along the lines of personal and social judgments of creativity. We introduce an integrative framework that endeavors to reconcile the divide between the personal and the social. Specifically, we introduce a model of Primary and Secondary Creativity, which illustrates how the one process of creativity can explain both personal and social judgments of creativity.
Keyword:
DEFINITION
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.5
论文数:
1.3K
被引数:
6.6K
机构
引用论文
QTLs for resistance to the false brome rustPuccinia brachypodiiin the model grassBrachypodium distachyonL..png)
Genome
GenomeIF0
PREAI
分享收藏Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity researchEDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGISTIF11.4
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容