arrow
返回

Protein sequence design by conformational landscape optimization

delete2021-03-12
delete107
delete
OA
AI
C
Christoffer Norn
B
Basile I. M. Wicky
D
David Juergens
S
Sirui Liu
D
David E. Kim
D
Doug Tischer
B
Brian Koepnick
I
Ivan Anishchenko
P
Players, Foldit
D
David Baker *
S
Sergey Ovchinnikov *
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2017228118delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The protein design problem is to identify an amino acid sequence that folds to a desired structure. Given Anfinsen's thermodynamic hypothesis of folding, this can be recast as finding an amino acid sequence for which the desired structure is the lowest energy state. As this calculation involves not only all possible amino acid sequences but also, all possible structures, most current approaches focus instead on the more tractable problem of finding the lowest-energy amino acid sequence for the desired structure, often checking by protein structure prediction in a second step that the desired structure is indeed the lowest-energy conformation for the designed sequence, and typically discarding a large fraction of designed sequences for which this is not the case. Here, we show that by backpropagating gradients through the transform-restrained Rosetta (trRosetta) structure prediction network from the desired structure to the input amino acid sequence, we can directly optimize over all possible amino acid sequences and all possible structures in a single calculation. We find that trRosetta calculations, which consider the full conformational landscape, can be more effective than Rosetta single-point energy estimations in predicting folding and stability of de novo designed proteins. We compare sequence design by conformational landscape optimization with the standard energy-based sequence design methodology in Rosetta and show that the former can result in energy landscapes with fewer alternative energy minima. We show further that more funneled energy landscapes can be designed by combining the strengths of the two approaches: the low-resolution trRosetta model serves to disfavor alternative states, and the high-resolution Rosetta model serves to create a deep energy minimum at the design target structure.
Keyword:
protein design
machine learning
energy landscape
sequence optimization
stability prediction

期刊

P
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IF:
9.1
论文数:
10.8W
被引数:
73.5W

机构

U
University of Washington
学者数:
8.0W
论文数: 7.0W
被引数: 12.5W
引用论文

引用论文

Child Temperament, Maternal Parenting Behavior, and Child Social Functioning
err2014-02-26
err0
errOAAI
errJulie Baer; Meghan Schreck; Robert R. Althoff; David Rettew; Valerie Harder; Lynsay Ayer; Matthew Albaugh; Eileen Crehan; Ana Kuny-Slock; James J. Hudziak
err分享
err收藏
Hepatocellular carcinoma in Budd-Chiari syndrome: characteristics and risk factors
errGut
IF0
err2008-02-13
err0
PREAI
errR Moucari; P-E Rautou; D Cazals-Hatem; A Geara; C Bureau; Y Consigny; C Francoz; M-H Denninger; V Vilgrain; J Belghiti; F Durand; D Valla; A Plessier
err分享
err收藏
Perturbing the energy landscape for improved packing during computational protein design
err2020-12-11
err92
errOAAI
errMaguire, Jack B.; Haddox, Hugh K.; Strickland, Devin; Halabiya, Samer F.; Coventry, Brian; Griffin, Jermel R.; Pulavarti, Surya V. S. R. K.; Cummins, Matthew; Thieker, David F.; Klavins, Eric; Szyperski, Thomas; DiMaio, Frank; Baker, David; Kuhlman, Brian
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容