.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Recently the term reflexivity has entered management discourses about research, education and practice. This paper highlights the ambiguity which prevails concerning the concept of reflexivity showing how the ways in which reflexivity itself is constituted inevitably articulates epistemological circularity in that commentators' definitions and prescriptions vary according to their tacit metatheoretical commitments. Hence the aim of this paper is to explore this paradox by excavating such commitments and demonstrating how they constitute particular forms of reflexivity - each with distinctive implications for the role of the management researcher in terms of aims, processes, and outcomes. Three generic forms of reflexivity are proposed: the methodological, the hyper or deconstructive, and the epistemic.
Keyword:
ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS
POSTMODERNISM
FIELD
METAPHORS
PARADIGMS
MODERNISM
STRATEGY
SCIENCE
SENSE
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.4
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
1.7W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Open preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernias using a mesh with nitinol memory frame.png)
Hernia.png)
HerniaIF0
PREAI
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏分享收藏1-8H-pyrano[3,2-g]benzoxazol-8-ones from 7-methoxyimino-4-methylchromene-2,8-dioneTetrahedron
TetrahedronIF0
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacyORGANIZATION SCIENCE
ORGANIZATION SCIENCEIF5.4
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容